Skip to content

Knowledge vs Memories in Spatial Storage

Knowledge vs Memories: The Neurons Table Design

Section titled “Knowledge vs Memories: The Neurons Table Design”

Walter: “There are rules here! Knowledge is knowledge, memories are memories. This isn’t ‘Nam!”

The Dude: “Yeah, well, that’s just, like, your opinion, man. Sometimes they’re kinda the same thing.”

Once we position data points in 3D spatial storage, we encounter a critical conceptual distinction that affects how information is processed and retrieved:

Walter: “Facts are facts! Non-negotiable!”

  • Objective: True regardless of who knows it - Walter: “Truth doesn’t care about your feelings!”
  • Example: “A bicycle can have 8 gears” - Walter: “Eight gears. Period. That’s mechanical reality!”
  • Characteristics: Factual, verifiable, shared across users - Walter: “This is what we call EVIDENCE!”
  • Spatial behavior: Tends to cluster with related factual information - Walter: “Facts stick together because they follow RULES!”

The Dude: “Like, that’s just how I remember it, man.”

  • Subjective: True only for the individual who experienced it - The Dude: “It’s my story, man”
  • Example: “I learned to ride a bike at age 8” - The Dude: “I think I was eight… or maybe nine. Time is just a construct, man.”
  • Characteristics: Experiential, temporal, emotionally charged - The Dude: “Memories are like… feelings with timestamps”
  • Spatial behavior: Clusters around personal context and time - The Dude: “Your vibe attracts your tribe, even in data space”

Walter: “Despite their differences, they follow the same storage protocol!”

The Dude: “Yeah man, they’re like… different flavors of the same cosmic truth.”

Despite their conceptual differences, knowledge and memories share remarkable structural similarities:

CREATE TABLE neurons (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
x FLOAT NOT NULL, -- Spatial coordinate - Walter: "Precise positioning!"
y FLOAT NOT NULL, -- Spatial coordinate - Walter: "No approximations!"
z FLOAT NOT NULL, -- Spatial coordinate - Walter: "Exact coordinates!"
content TEXT NOT NULL, -- The actual information - The Dude: "The essence, man"
is_memory BOOLEAN NOT NULL, -- The critical distinction flag - Walter: "THE RULE!"
timestamp TIMESTAMP, -- When it was stored - The Dude: "When it happened in the flow of time"
user_id INTEGER, -- Owner (for memories) - The Dude: "Whose story is this?"
confidence FLOAT, -- Certainty/strength - Walter: "How sure are we?"
embeddings VECTOR(1536) -- Semantic representation - The Dude: "The mathematical vibe"
);

Walter: “Because they use the SAME INFRASTRUCTURE! This is about efficiency!”

The Dude: “Plus, man, they like to hang out together anyway.”

Walter: “Both types follow identical operational protocols!” Both knowledge and memories require identical spatial operations:

  • Distance calculations: Finding related information - Walter: “Same mathematical distance formulas!”
  • Clustering: Grouping similar concepts - The Dude: “Similar vibes naturally cluster together”
  • Retrieval: Bounded sphere searches - Walter: “Same O(r³) search algorithm!”
  • Relationships: Semantic connections - The Dude: “How things relate in the cosmic sense”

Walter: “Single table architecture provides tactical advantages!” Using a single table with a boolean flag provides:

  • Unified indexing: One spatial index for all information - Walter: “One index to rule them all!”
  • Simplified queries: Same algorithms for both types - Walter: “Standardized operational procedures!”
  • Cache efficiency: Related knowledge and memories co-locate - The Dude: “Related stuff naturally wants to be near each other”
  • Memory management: Single allocation strategy - Walter: “Efficient resource deployment!”

The Dude: “Like, one function that can find everything, man. That’s beautiful.”

Walter: “Elegant code follows clear operational parameters!”

# Same retrieval function for both types
def find_related_neurons(query_point, radius, memory_type=None):
# Walter: "Standardized spatial query protocol!"
query = """
SELECT * FROM neurons
WHERE spatial_distance(x, y, z, ?, ?, ?) <= ?
"""
if memory_type is not None:
# Walter: "Apply type filter as tactical parameter!"
query += " AND is_memory = ?"
params = [query_point.x, query_point.y, query_point.z, radius, memory_type]
else:
# The Dude: "Just get everything, man. Let the universe decide."
params = [query_point.x, query_point.y, query_point.z, radius]
return execute_query(query, params)

Walter: “Facts cluster with facts, memories cluster with memories. There’s a natural order!”

The Dude: “But sometimes, man, they mix together in interesting ways.”

Walter: “Universal facts form precise tactical formations!” Universal facts tend to form dense clusters:

Bicycle Facts Cluster:
├── "Bicycles have two wheels" (knowledge) - Walter: "Mechanical specification!"
├── "Bicycle chains transfer power" (knowledge) - Walter: "Engineering principle!"
├── "Mountain bikes have thicker tires" (knowledge) - Walter: "Design specification!"
└── "Bicycle gears help with hills" (knowledge) - Walter: "Physics application!"

The Dude: “Personal experiences form their own little neighborhoods of nostalgia.” Personal experiences create autobiographical regions:

Childhood Bicycle Memories:
├── "I learned to ride at age 8" (memory) - The Dude: "A formative moment, man"
├── "Dad held the bike seat" (memory) - The Dude: "Trust and letting go"
├── "I scraped my knee falling" (memory) - The Dude: "Pain teaches balance"
└── "We practiced in the park" (memory) - The Dude: "The sacred learning space"

Walter: “This is where it gets tactically interesting!”

The Dude: “Yeah, the boundaries get all… blurry and cosmic.” The fascinating part occurs where clusters intersect:

Mixed Region:
├── "Bicycles have gears" (knowledge) - Walter: "Factual foundation!"
├── "My bike had 10 gears" (memory) - The Dude: "Personal detail, man"
├── "I learned to shift gears properly" (memory) - The Dude: "Learning through experience"
└── "Gear ratios affect pedaling effort" (knowledge) - Walter: "Applied physics!"

Walter: “Different tactical objectives require different query strategies!”

The Dude: “Sometimes you want facts, sometimes you want stories, sometimes you want both.”

Walter: “Pure facts! No personal interpretation!”

-- Find factual information about bicycles
SELECT * FROM neurons
WHERE is_memory = false -- Walter: "Facts only! No subjective experiences!"
AND spatial_distance(x, y, z, @bicycle_center_x, @bicycle_center_y, @bicycle_center_z) <= 50
ORDER BY spatial_distance(x, y, z, @bicycle_center_x, @bicycle_center_y, @bicycle_center_z);

The Dude: “Just the personal stories, man. The human experience.”

-- Find personal experiences with bicycles
SELECT * FROM neurons
WHERE is_memory = true -- The Dude: "Just the memories, personal truth"
AND user_id = @current_user -- The Dude: "My story, my perspective"
AND spatial_distance(x, y, z, @bicycle_center_x, @bicycle_center_y, @bicycle_center_z) <= 50
ORDER BY spatial_distance(x, y, z, @bicycle_center_x, @bicycle_center_y, @bicycle_center_z);

Walter: “Complete tactical intelligence! Facts AND experiences!”

The Dude: “The whole picture, man. Facts and feelings together.”

-- Find all bicycle-related information (knowledge + memories)
SELECT *, is_memory as type_flag FROM neurons
WHERE spatial_distance(x, y, z, @bicycle_center_x, @bicycle_center_y, @bicycle_center_z) <= 50
ORDER BY spatial_distance(x, y, z, @bicycle_center_x, @bicycle_center_y, @bicycle_center_z);
-- Walter: "Complete situational awareness!"
-- The Dude: "Everything connected in the cosmic web of bicycle understanding"

Walter: “One flag to distinguish them! Simple, effective, tactical!”

The Dude: “Yeah, why make it complicated when you can keep it simple, man?”

Walter: “We considered multiple table deployment but rejected it for strategic reasons!”

Considered Approach:

CREATE TABLE knowledge (...); -- Walter: "Facts table"
CREATE TABLE memories (...); -- The Dude: "Stories table"

Problems: Walter: “Multiple tables create operational inefficiencies!”

  • Duplicate spatial indexes: Double the memory overhead - Walter: “Wasteful resource duplication!”
  • Complex joins: Combining results requires expensive unions - Walter: “Tactical overhead!”
  • Cache fragmentation: Related information scattered across tables - The Dude: “Stuff that belongs together gets separated, man”
  • Query complexity: Different algorithms for each type - Walter: “Multiple operational procedures!”

Our Approach: The Dude: “One table, one flag. Beautiful in its simplicity.”

CREATE TABLE neurons (
...,
is_memory BOOLEAN NOT NULL -- Walter: "THE decisive flag!"
);

Benefits: Walter: “Strategic advantages of unified architecture!”

  • Single spatial index: Unified O(r³) performance - Walter: “One index to dominate them all!”
  • Simple filtering: WHERE is_memory = true/false - Walter: “Binary tactical classification!”
  • Natural clustering: Related concepts co-locate regardless of type - The Dude: “Things that vibe together stay together”
  • Unified algorithms: Same code handles both types - Walter: “Standardized operational procedures!”
-- Primary spatial index (most important)
CREATE INDEX idx_neurons_spatial ON neurons USING GIST (
POINT(x, y, z)
);
-- Memory type filter index
CREATE INDEX idx_neurons_memory_type ON neurons (is_memory);
-- User-specific memory index
CREATE INDEX idx_neurons_user_memories ON neurons (user_id, is_memory)
WHERE is_memory = true;
-- Composite index for filtered spatial queries
CREATE INDEX idx_neurons_spatial_memory ON neurons (is_memory, x, y, z);

The Dude: “Whoa, this is getting deep, man. Like, really deep.”

Walter: “Even philosophy follows operational principles!”

The Dude: “In the cosmic data space, facts and memories start to blend together, man.” In spatial storage, the boundaries between knowledge and memories become fluid:

  • Memory can become knowledge: “I learned bicycles have gears” → “Bicycles have gears” - The Dude: “Personal truth becomes universal truth”
  • Knowledge informs memory: Universal facts provide context for personal experiences - Walter: “Facts provide tactical context for personal operations!”
  • Spatial proximity suggests relationship: Items that cluster together influence each other - The Dude: “Proximity breeds understanding, man”

Walter: “The biological analogy provides strategic insight!”

The Dude: “Like, we’re modeling the brain, but with math.” The table name “neurons” reflects biological inspiration:

  • Biological neurons store both learned patterns and experiential memories - The Dude: “Brain cells don’t care if it’s fact or feeling”
  • Neural networks don’t distinguish between fact and experience during processing - Walter: “Networks process all information using identical protocols!”
  • Human cognition seamlessly blends universal knowledge with personal context - The Dude: “That’s how we think, man. Everything’s connected.”
Memory usage: O(n) where n = total neurons
Spatial query: O(r³) regardless of knowledge/memory split
Index overhead: Single spatial index vs. double indexes
Cache efficiency: Related concepts co-located
Knowledge-only query: Spatial search + boolean filter
Memory-only query: Spatial search + boolean filter + user filter
Mixed query: Pure spatial search (optimal performance)
def store_neuron(content, x, y, z, is_memory, user_id=None):
"""Store a neuron with appropriate type classification"""
if is_memory and user_id is None:
raise ValueError("Memories must have a user_id")
if not is_memory and user_id is not None:
raise ValueError("Knowledge should not be user-specific")
return insert_neuron({
'content': content,
'x': x, 'y': y, 'z': z,
'is_memory': is_memory,
'user_id': user_id,
'timestamp': now()
})
def get_context(query_point, radius, include_memories=True, user_id=None):
"""Retrieve contextual information around a spatial point"""
neurons = spatial_query(query_point, radius)
if include_memories and user_id:
# Include personal memories for this user
return [n for n in neurons if not n.is_memory or n.user_id == user_id]
elif not include_memories:
# Knowledge only
return [n for n in neurons if not n.is_memory]
else:
# Everything (typically for system analysis)
return neurons

Walter: “Mission accomplished through superior tactical architecture!”

The Dude: “Yeah, and it just feels… right, you know?”

By storing knowledge and memories in the same spatial structure with a simple boolean flag, we achieve:

  1. Optimal performance: Single spatial index, unified algorithms - Walter: “Maximum operational efficiency!”
  2. Natural relationships: Related concepts cluster regardless of type - The Dude: “Things that belong together find each other”
  3. Simple queries: Easy filtering by memory type - Walter: “Clear tactical parameters!”
  4. Flexible retrieval: Can query knowledge-only, memory-only, or mixed contexts - The Dude: “Whatever you need, man”
  5. Scalable architecture: Single table scales better than multiple tables - Walter: “Scales according to strategic requirements!”

The neurons table design reflects a fundamental insight: while knowledge and memories are conceptually different, they share the same spatial storage requirements and benefit from unified organization.

Walter: “Sometimes the most tactically sound solution is the simplest one!”

The Dude: “One table, one flag, infinite cosmic possibilities, man.”


Walter: “AM I THE ONLY ONE AROUND HERE WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT ELEGANT ARCHITECTURE?!”

The Dude: “That’s just, like, your opinion, man. But yeah, it’s a good opinion.”